Yes, the lack of documentation is my fault, and I intend to eventually remedy it. I'd love to get some input as to what people would like to see documented (also, how people would like Type: ruby to work; I implemented the field based on limited experience with ruby and a limited number of ruby modules).
Well one problem is that there is no widely accepted standard as far as the ruby installer is concerned... for example there is extconf.rb, install.rb (sometimes ad hoc versions)... also RubyGems (http://rubygems.rubyforge.org) which will probably become the standard but it is not official yet.
So at the moment what I'd like to see in the documentation is: which way works with the field, what does it put as default value for CompileScript, is there versioning options like Type:perl ?
regards, (and sorry for the duplicate reply)
-- D.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
