On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 07:22:32PM +1000, Jeremy Higgs wrote: > > On a side note, is there any problem with having one ettercap info file > that supports the -ssl and -gtk variants? I was under the impression > that SSL stuff had to be kept under the crypto section, but haven't > been following development for quite a while, so I don't know if the > situation has changed.
That is still the situation. > Can anyone shed some light on that? It would be > nice to just have one package description file for all four variants... You could use the same .info template with variants/etc., but instead of a single file with both -ssl options: Type: -ssl (boolean) clone the file and have each hard-code the desired -ssl value. So the crypto tree would have a .info with: Type: -ssl (-ssl) (or even just "Type: -ssl") and the non-crypto tree would have: Type: -ssl (.) dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
