On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 01:35:16PM +0100, Matthias Ringwald wrote: > hi > > I'd like to point out, why I would be happy to have a QT/Mac package > although > its not binary compatible and the other fink apps will not run on top > of it. > > I tried to build a QT Application both with QT/X11 and QT/Mac, and for > this I needed both > installed (once at a time) to test things. being able to tell fink > install qt-mac, which would > result in uninstalling qt/x11 and installation of qt-mac, is preferable > to uninstalling > qt/x11 using fink and manually compiling and installing qt/mac. also > un-installing qt/mac > would be convenient in fink. > > so switching between both using fink would be helpful. > that's for the short term. > > in the mid-term, are there reasons the qt-mac libraries cannot be > installed as, let say, > libqtmac*... so being able to have qt/x11 apps installed while having > qt/mac-dev at the same > time ? > > Actually I started setting up a qt/mac.info but forgot how far I got > (other things, other priotities..) > Actually it should be possible to have both installed (if the qt/Quartz library was renamed or put into a different directory), and just switch qt-x11-dev and qt-quartz-dev or whatever which would contain the include files and library symlinks for compile time linking.
That way both X version and Mac version of the application could run side by side. Thanks Michal Suchanek ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
