Thanks!
On 23 Nov 2004, at 13:35, David R. Morrison wrote:
BSD-type licenses generally don't identify themselves as "BSD."
The MIT X-license also counts as a BSD-type license, for example.
-- Dave
On Nov 21, 2004, at 8:57 PM, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
On 22 Nov 2004, at 2:03, Benjamin Reed wrote:
Jeremy Higgs wrote:
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
are met:
1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
3. The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote products
derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
this sounds a lot like the BSD license to me
Thanks, Ben!
So even though it doesn't mention the BSD license in the license itself, it's alright to classify it as BSD?
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
