As for variation. At this point will no longer be interchangeable. This may only be temporary.
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 5-Feb-05, at 9:26 AM, Michèle Garoche wrote:
Le 5 févr. 2005, à 17:01, TheSin a écrit :
Anyhow, any maintainer wishing to help us out and help speed this new great tool up for us, please follow this next set of instructions to fix your pkgs:I'll guess you want a report of what builds without changes, what needs changes, and so on. So, under which form and where should it be sent?
all pkgs such be able fink build foo with out the depends line so comment it out and add what is needed to builddep line. This is to test build only, so use fink build to test this and not install. Also please don't commit it like this. Again this is only to test that the pkg will build sans the Depends line. Install and Run time deps are still required at this point and that includes the -shlibs pkgs so don't start removing those yet.
Also contrary to some pkgs and what we may have stated before please do NOT useThen what to do with the packages which lists such variations as Depends or BuildDepends?
foo-shlibs (>= 1.0-1) | foo-ssl-shlibs (>= 1.0-1).
What to do when the variations are different from a branch to another, or from a tree to another one?
Michèle <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
