-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
|>> What is the reason for this weird situation? Shouldn't the reason at |>> least be mentioned in the info file?
The reason seems to be that Justin patched the old (stable) libdnet to build shared libraries. It did not build shared on any platform, so he picked the release number as the library version number. The newer version uses GNU libtool and has the same install_name.
I think we should state in our policy that libraries which were not designed to be shared libs on any platform should not be patched to make shared libs for fink (note that libs which build shared on GNU/linux etc are okay to patch). Otherwise we could run into this problem more often.
Thoughts? Peter - -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBQn9feriDAg3OZTLPAQJMwgP/ZLiXzAodWE096r5zIExSDw1Z7TZfa47w 1ktnxbW2u8M+eY1Hrzn6VSfw8c3X7UjfRGTQ3KmFB5GYhGGgWNlZiXLeoclr9LAk LbD4B7g4TgK+/G17rlb5fUdre9AFCwsgyaTjGs80JiVWyPv8y1KIg61LT6SR3DDU k7Hy/XOW/X8= =NrSK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
