On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 12:45:18AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
> David Bacher wrote:
> >
> >If I hear any demand for this package, I'm happy to try to build and
> >submit a more recent version -- and I'll find a solution for the
> >problem discussed above.
> 
> I see now that I have it installed on one of my machines, too; I don't 
> remember why. Others have it installed, or the problem wouldn't have 
> come up. Is that enough motivation for upgrading the package?

Also, the current package cannot be compiled with gcc4, so it's not
available for intel people. IIRC, it's not trivial to fix it, but
newer versions appear to be clean(er:) for gcc4.

dan

-- 
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to