Martin Costabel wrote:

> The fink engine gurus have remained stubbornly silent about this since I
> reported it 3 weeks ago.

"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by
stupidity."

Or, in my case, forgetfulness.  I saw the original e-mail and had meant
to look into it, but failed to put it in my TODO so it got lost in the
shuffle.  Been pretty busy recently.

The problem's in CVS fink only, anyways, the usual warnings apply.

> --- NetAccess.pm_ori    2006-01-18 20:47:28.000000000 +0100
> +++ NetAccess.pm        2006-04-15 21:15:33.000000000 +0200
> @@ -270,1 +270,1 @@
> -  if (defined $checksum and (not Fink::Checksum->validate($file,
> $checksum))) {
> +  if (defined $checksum and (not Fink::Checksum->validate($file,
> $checksum, $checksum_type))) {

This seems right.  To be honest, I've swapped out the part of my brain
that remembers how all that stuff works since I wrote it, I'd have to
dig into all the code again and re-learn the checksumming bits.  I'm out
of town with family and don't have time to look any deeper at the moment.

I'll commit it and we can hope for the best.  :)

-- 
Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick
http://ranger.befunk.com/




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to