On Jan 4, 2006, at 12:37 PM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
Careful though not to automatically add -e to a patchscript beginning eg with#!/usr/bin/perl Should fink know about all possible interpreters ?
I think it should, yes. There are only a few possible shells, so hardcoding them shouldn't be a big deal. Even if it misses one or two, I think it would still have a higher success rate than relying on package maintainers.
If someone can tell me what part of Fink's source code needs to be modified, I could submit a patch for this.
Trevor
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
