I successfully built openoffice.org-firefox-2.0.1+m156-104 on my
PowerBook, which is currently set up for 10.4-transitional. So far
everything seems to run as it did on prior versions.
However, I was looking around at some of the object files to see if I
would have to rebuild the package on my 10.4 (real) setup. The files
that I looked at all look like the following:
$ otool -L /sw/lib/openoffice.org-firefox/program/uno.bin
/sw/lib/openoffice.org-firefox/program/uno.bin:
@executable_path/libuno_sal.dylib.3 (compatibility version
0.0.0, current version 0.0.0)
@executable_path/libuno_salhelpergcc3.dylib.3 (compatibility
version 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0)
@executable_path/libuno_cppu.dylib.3 (compatibility version
0.0.0, current version 0.0.0)
@executable_path/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.dylib.3
(compatibility version 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0)
/usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.6.dylib (compatibility version 6.2.0,
current version 6.2.0)
@executable_path/libstlport_gcc.dylib (compatibility version
0.0.0, current version 0.0.0)
/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0,
current version 88.1.5)
$ otool -L /sw/lib/openoffice.org-firefox/program/libreg.dylib.3
/sw/lib/openoffice.org-firefox/program/libreg.dylib.3:
@executable_path/libreg.dylib.3 (compatibility version
0.0.0, current version 0.0.0)
@executable_path/libuno_sal.dylib.3 (compatibility version
0.0.0, current version 0.0.0)
@executable_path/libuno_salhelpergcc3.dylib.3 (compatibility
version 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0)
@executable_path/libstore.dylib.3 (compatibility version
0.0.0, current version 0.0.0)
/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0,
current version 88.1.5)
@executable_path/libstlport_gcc.dylib (compatibility version
0.0.0, current version 0.0.0)
(i.e. @executable_path didn't get replaced by '/sw/lib/openoffice.org-
firefox/program/ when the install_name for any of the libraries was
set).
I don't know if this matters for libraries that are only used
internally (I'm sending -devel this message too to get information
there), but I thought I should mention it.
Also, is there a reason that the libraries are named "libreg dylib.
3" (for example) rather than "libreg.3.dylib"?
--AKH
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
