Hi folks: I have a question about one of my packages. (Sorry.) gtk-canvas
It builds a static library, has some header files, and a test program in /sw/share that demonstrates both of its features. I maintain it as it is a dependency I need for another package (coot). With the help of Daniel Macks and coot's author (Paul Emsley) and most recently David Morrison, I think it is functional and no longer violates any of the fink prime directives (it has the potential to interfere with libart, for example). I have two questions: 1. Since it is mainly a static library and header files, should I rename it gtk-canvas-dev? Debian seems to do this, and gtk-canvas is just the set of doc files (I guess they don't install the test ones). 2. Is there anyone who has a better grasp of this package than I do who would like to add this to their empire? Thanks. Bill ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
