On 6/18/07, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Benjamin Reed wrote: > [] > > I agree. If the package needs headers, it should be testing for them, > > and use them. > > > > If you need to fix it temporarily, fix the code to have the right -I on > > the compile-line without a test. > > > > Both are better than trying to fake up "system" headers apple probably > > shouldn't have done that way in the first place, and that don't match > > other unixes. :) > > Are you sure they aren't there in Linux? Many packages seem to rely on > them, which is usually a sign for their presence in Linux. > > Another question is how the package maintainer can find such problems if > he uses Apple's X11. > > I'd prefer if the Fink X11 packages behaved as closely as possible like > Apple's X11, including for compiling other stuff. > > -- > Martin > As a data point, both of my Linux boxes (Debian and Kubuntu) have /usr/include/X11, but that's actually the real location of the X11 headers.
-- Alexander K. Hansen akh AT finkproject DOT org Fink User Liaison and Documenter ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel