I propose that ruby16 join the list of obsolete versions of language packages that we won't support in 10.5. (The others already on this list are perl581, perl581, python23, and java13.) We would retain ruby 18.
Does anybody forsee any problems with this? -- Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
