On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 06:34:36PM -0400, Daniel Macks wrote: > On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 12:18:33PM -0400, Koen van der Drift wrote: > > > > On the package database, the package python-biopython-py22 is not > > listed as obsolete in the 10.3 tree, whereas the other ones are (it's > > being superseded by biopython-py). I don't use 10.3, so if someone > > with 10.3 access could fix that I would appreciate it. > > The Description fields seen on the PDB are those of the highest-known > release of the package or the release of the package in the highest > (most modern) fink tree. python-biopython-py22 is only present in the > 10.3 tree, not the 10.4 tree at all (all python22 is dropped from the > 10.4 distro). However, biopython-py is only present in the 10.4 > distro, not the 10.3 one. In the 10.3 world, python-biopython-py22 is > not obsolete and that is the highest version or distro of that > package, so it is not listed as obsolete on the PDB. I can take a look > at backporting biopython-py from 10.4 to 10.3, including a py22 > variant, and thus make python-biopython-py obsolet in 10.3.
Oops, biopython-py is only compatible with python >= 2.3. So maybe python-biopython-py22 really isn't and shouldn't be obsolete? Do you prefer a self-consistent package-naming scheme in 10.3 as python-biopython-py and a self-consistent biopython-py in 10.4 or if you prefer biopython-py in all distros where possible, and leave an older python-biopython-py only for py22 in 10.3. dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
