Probably it won't be merged, but llvm-project already provides ways to build the backend for the current gcc.
I actually tried it locally — it works. But, I guess, I am not the right person to package the beast for fink On 9/12/07, Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexey, > The problem is that llvm is unlikely to be merged into > gcc for 4.3 (and I'm not even sure it will make gcc 4.4). > Actually a more interesting change slated for gcc 4.4 > is the replacement of the haifa scheduler. It is described > in the gcc 2007 summit proceedings... > > https://ols2006.108.redhat.com/2007/GCC-Reprints/GCC2007-Proceedings.pdf > > in the section "Implementing an instruction scheduler for GCC: > progress, caveats and evaluation". Apparently the haifa > scheduler has some fundamental limitations that are not > easily worked around and this new scheduler is supposed to > be much better. > Jack > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:23:02AM +0400, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote: > > Another interesting thing to test would be llvm-based gcc ;) > > > > -- > > Alexey Zakhlestin > > http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/ > -- Alexey Zakhlestin http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
