Hi all, The latest upstream of gerbv has dropped support for GTK+1, so I would like to move to a single package file for gerbv.info and gerbv-gtk2.info.
I used to have gerbv conflict and replace gerbv-gtk2 (and vice versa) since it didn't seem worth it to have both packages coexist (it's small enough to swap out if needed). Now, gerbv-gtk2 is a bundle/splitoff that just depends on the main package and fink-obsolete-packages. For some reason, I kept the Replaces: line in the main file so that it could overwrite the old gerbv-gtk2 package, but that produces some interesting error messages if you upgrade by typing "fink install gerbv-gtk2". Is it reasonable to have the old package be replaced by the unified one? Should I just stick to the traditional method of depending on fink-obsolete-packages, and letting the user clean up obsolete packages manually? The working .info file is attached. -- - Charles Lepple
gerbv.info
Description: Binary data
------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
