On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 09:06:50AM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote: > Daniel Macks wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:04:50AM -0700, Trevor Harmon wrote: > > > >> On Mar 16, 2008, at 7:11 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: > >> > >> > >>> OSX 10.5.2 update, perhaps? > >>> > >> No, that was released on February 11. The package was working fine > >> with it. I'm pretty sure it was a change in Fink that's causing this > >> problem. > >> > > > > You probably still have the older fink package in /sw/fink/debs; you > > can "sudo dpkg -i fink-whatever.deb" to upgrade and downgrade manually > > and find out exactly whether that's what matters. > > > > dan > > > > > One can't do _much_ of a downgrade in this case. As committed from the > tracker, the package declared a BuildDepend on fink ( >= 0.27.99 ). I > tried building with fink-0.28.0 on 10.5.2 w/affiliated stuff current as > of midnight, which resulted in the same failure as with fink-0.28.1 .
The BuildDepends:fink(>= 0.28) is only due to the private Shlibs; since it appears we're talking about a build error (i.e., well before the .deb gets created) , you can safely remove that BDep entirely. FWIW, I didn't test this submission...was a minor-version update to an existing package with minimal interaction with other packages, assumed that if it worked for submitter when submitted, it was good to go. dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
