On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 07:01:08PM -0400, Dave Reiser wrote: > I'm working on getting qscintilla2 functional so that a tracker item and a > few additional packages that depend on it can make progress. > > Qscintilla2 is built via qmake, and no .la file is generated. At the end of > fink -mv --build-as-nobody rebuild qscintilla2, I get: > > Validating .deb dir > /sw/src/fink.build/root-qscintilla2-qt4-x11-shlibs-2.2-1... > Error: File name '/sw/lib/qt4-x11/lib/libqscintilla2.3.dylib' specified in > Shlibs does not appear to have linker data at all > Error: package contains a dylib with no corresponding Shlibs entry > (/sw/lib/qt4-x11/lib/libqscintilla2.3.0.0.dylib -> libqscintilla2.3.dylib > 3.0.0) > If this is a private library, add > '!/sw/lib/qt4-x11/lib/libqscintilla2.3.0.0.dylib' to the Shlibs field. > Removing runtime build-lock... > > If I run otool -L on the 3.0.0.dylib, I get: > > /sw/src/fink.build/root-qscintilla2-qt4-x11-shlibs-2.2-1/sw/lib/qt4-x11/lib/libqscintilla2.3.0.0.dylib: > libqscintilla2.3.dylib (compatibility version 3.0.0, current version > 3.0.0)
That is usually a full path, not just the filename. Not sure if that's *the* problem, but it's unusual enough that it might confuse the validator. > Qscintilla 1.65 is built in roughly the same fashion, also has no .la file, > but the fink validator doesn't complain about it. What's its otool-L? dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
