On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 04:15:39PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: > Max Horn wrote: > > Am 27.04.2008 um 13:19 schrieb Martin Costabel: > > > >> Max Horn wrote: > >>> Here is the next one I got: > >>> Reading buildlock packages... > >>> All buildlocks accounted for. > >>> While trying to install: > >>> glibmm2.4-dev-2.14.2-2 > >>> glibmm2.4-shlibs-2.14.2-2 > >>> The following inconsistencies found: > >>> Unsatisfied dependency in glibmm2.4: glibmm2.4-dev (= > >>> 2.12.10-1003) > >> It would be interesting to know how you got there. Not by using > >> update-all, I suppose? Was glibmm2.4-dev-2.14.2-2 pulled in as a > >> dependency of something else? > > > > Not an update-all, right, I wanted to update certain packages only. > > But I can reduce the issue to the case you mentioned: > > > >> Does "fink update glibmm2.4" work, or does it block itself? > > > > It blocks itself. > > In this situation it is hard to see an automatic update path that would > work in all cases. Or perhaps, if the new glibmm2.4-dev (in file > glibmm2.4-shlibs.info) had not only > > Replaces: glibmm2.4 (<< %v-%r) > > which it does, but also > > Conflicts: glibmm2.4 (<< %v-%r) > > this could work.
Sounds reasonable. glibmm2.4 itself was some files that got moved into glibmm2.4-dev so glibmm2.4 the -dev does indeed completely take over now. dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
