I'd personally vote in favor of keeping them separated - I like being able to only pull in the pieces that I want.
- Evan Charles Lepple wrote: > On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Charles Lepple<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Does anyone have an issue with upgrading Twisted to 8.1? Someone mentioned >> on the Buildbot list that Python 2.5 breaks some things in Twisted 2.1 (the >> current version), and nobody is listed as a maintainer for Twisted. >> >> I'll take a stab at upgrading if nobody complains, but it isn't going to be >> pretty if I do it. Suggestions appreciated. >> > > Along these lines, would anyone be upset if I merged all of Twisted > into a single twisted8 package? > > I could go either way, really, but it seems easier to make one big > package than to update a bunch of smaller packages that all seem to > get updated at about the same time as the main tarball. > > Since there aren't many Fink packages that use Twisted, I assume that > it was originally packaged for projects outside Fink. I would leave > the twisted2-* packages as-is for now, but later we could change them > to depend on twisted8. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
