On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:28:51PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On Sep 23, 2008, at 7:55 PM, James Bunton wrote: > >> As far as I can tell doxygen does not need to depend on graphviz or >> LaTeX. Removing these two dependencies would make the dependency list >> of many packages significantly smaller. Graphviz in particular pulls >> in a lot of other packages. >> <snip> > > You may want to check out > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user/27082
From the link you posted: > doxygen builds w/out the need for latex, graphviz, and ghostscript if > you remove the "make install_docs" line from InstallScript. There's a > check for dot (from graphviz) during ./configure, but I don't know if > the output of the build is the same w/ or w/out it. I'm happy to have a shot at making a doxygen.info and doxygen-docs.info doxygen-docs can bring in everything needed to build the doxygen samples, but would not need to be depended on by anything. doxygen proper would be built to always work with whatever was installed at runtime. If a package needed doxygen with graphviz, it could depend on both of them. Does this seem like a reasonable and useful approach to others? --- James
pgpgLSmaiM5sj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
