Bill,

There are problems with doing so, since libtool and autoconf based  
packages can't easily compile things "universal" by default.  I know  
that RangerRick has played with this some in the past, and he  
developed some automatic procedures which worked for probably 80% of  
all packages, but the rest would need to be modified by hand...

   -- Dave


On Dec 5, 2008, at 11:10 AM, William Scott wrote:

> Has anyone played around with making an unofficial fink version that
> can compile universal binaries and libraries?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> William G. Scott
>
> Contact info:
> http://chemistry.ucsc.edu/~wgscott/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas,  
> Nevada.
> The future of the web can't happen without you.  Join us at MIX09 to  
> help
> pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Fink-devel mailing list
> Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you.  Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel

Reply via email to