On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:00:15PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > I was following the debian rules approach to building > both unzip-6.0 and zip-3.0. What version of bzip2 does > 10.4 have? If it doesn't have 1.0.5 that might be a > good reason to use the fink bzip2. Otherwise, I can > remove that part of the packaging.
Wait, maybe I misunderstood what you are doing. I read "The new packaging is modified to build the bzip2 support in both packages" to mean it uses a bzip that is part of zip itself (internal rather than relying on external lib at all). If it uses external lib, then I completely support using fink's lib rather than apple's for many reasons. dan -- Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
