David R. Morrison wrote: [] > However, I can't think of a case other than the openssl nonsense > where this would apply. And many openssl packages have been > converted to use the openssl which ships with os x (rather than > fink's) which makes it ok to distribute. So I'm thinking that it > might be better to spend energy in revising those packages, rather > than in writing fink code (and distfiles code) to handle a new > special case.
A healthier option would be to simply ignore that silly pissing contest between gnu and openssl and declare gpl packages as gpl, full stop. To any non-American at least it is clear that we are splitting hairs here that don't even exist, since Fink has stopped distributing binaries long ago. -- Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
