Sounds good to me. Maybe we should hear from the Jacks as well. -- Dave
On Aug 13, 2010, at 1:57 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > How about if I implement the following then: > > change the extant gcc45-10.4.info to look for gcc45-10.4.patch > copy the extant gcc45.patch to gcc45-10.4.patch > commit the 10.5 and 10.6-relevant files (gcc45.patch, gcc45.info, > gcc45-x86_64.info) from the tracker > > ? > > That way we will have the updated gcc45 in 10.5 and 10.6, with the > option to update it in 10.4. > > On 8/11/10 9:19 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: >> If I could make a small suggestion on this thread. Fink's support for 10.4 >> will end fairly soon, so it would not be such a bad thing if gcc 4.5.1 only >> runs on 10.5 and 10.6. >> >> -- Dave >> >> >> On Aug 11, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 07:48:45PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> On 8/11/10 4:56 PM, Jack Fink wrote: >>>>>> Salut Jack, >>>>>> the problem on 10.4-i386 (with 2 dwarves) is that the build tries to >>>>>> build something as x86_64, which can't succeed with a 32bit libc.dylib. >>>>>> Cheers (and thanks for putting that much brain/time/effort into gcc!) >>>>>> >>>>>> -jack >>>>>> >>>> >>>> Jack, >>>> Is this with Xcode 2.5? I'm surprised I didn't hear about this >>>> problem before although I do see... >>>> >>>> Historical Footnote: Compiling 64-Bit Command-Line Code for Mac OS X v10.4 >>>> >>>> Mac OS X v10.4 supports some 64-bit executables. However, Mac OS X v10.4 >>>> does not include a full 64-bit stack; Mac OS X v10.4 contains only >>>> libSystem and the Accelerate framework in 64-bit versions. In addition, >>>> Mac OS X 10.4 includes neither the Objective-C runtime nor a 64-bit >>>> Objective-C-capable version of dyld. Because of these differences, if you >>>> try to execute a 64-bit executable in 10.4 that depends on these >>>> 10.5-specific features, it would crash. >>>> >>>> To prevent new 64-bit executables from running as 64-bit on version 10.4, >>>> Apple changed the CPU subtype for 64-bit executables that depend on >>>> high-level frameworks. >>>> >>>> If you need to compile an executable as 64-bit for Mac OS X v10.4, you >>>> must select the 10.4 deployment target when building 64-bit executables >>>> and separate your code into a 32-bit front-end (GUI) portion and a 64-bit >>>> back-end (processing) portion. >>>> >>>> at >>>> http://developer.apple.com/mac/library/documentation/Darwin/Conceptual/64bitPorting/building/building.html. >>>> Did the any of the previous gcc4x packages build the x86_64 multilib under >>>> 10.4? >>>> Jack >>>> >> >> And you got an error with the prior iteration (no dwarf2) ? >> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by >>> >>> Make an app they can't live without >>> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fink-devel mailing list >>> Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel >>> Subscription management: >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel > > - -- > Alexander Hansen > Fink User Liaison > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkxlsb4ACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ9AJgCeOUNa981ur8/aA8geTh7q9sRy > a7MAnA054dX9k1lbtQA3YQQ3CwlNBl2K > =ZFu3 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
