Remko,
That is the plan. We always migrate fink to the latest gcc4x
packaging but this takes time to execute.
Jack
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Remko Scharroo <re...@altimetrics.com> wrote:
> Dear Fink Developers,
>
> Today I saw the first dependency on gcc49 in fftw3.info.
>
> This is a major pain since (as far as I know) all other package require at
> most gcc48.
>
> When that introduction does not go paired with upgrading ALL packages that
> now require gcc48 to be requiring gcc49 this will remain a back mess for
> users like me, who use a lot of gfortran related packages, like
> netcdf-fortran5.
>
> In case of fftw3 this was only a packaging update, not a version change,
> so I do not understand why the necessity to change from gcc48 to gcc49?
>
> Granted, for fftw3 it is a BuildDepends only, but still, what’s the rush,
> particularly since gcc49 is still at 4.9.0, and might not be stable yet.
>
> I would suggest to either revert fftw3 back to gcc48 or start a
> consolidated effort to upgrade all packages depending on gcc48 to gcc49.
>
> Regards,
> Remko
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
