1) A while back I proposed having 10.9 and 10.10 share a tree. This would involve:
1) Putting out a fink which knows not to symlink 10.9 to 10.7 2) Generate the a tree in cvs (since it's unlikely that we're going to have git update going in short order) 3) Maintainers doing 10.9-related updates in that tree. There's a fairly large divergence between 10.8 and 10.9, and from the relatively limited 10.10 feedback we've gotten the 10.9 - 10.10 divergence seems smaller, so this seems like it would be less of a hassle for maintainers than starting a 10.10 tree. In principle we could could just stay in 10.7/ , but selfupdates become a longer process. Any strong opinions? 2) Does anybody have a strong objection to not having an upgrade path between 10.9 and 10.10? They're using the same C++ standard. -- Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. Fink User Liaison My package updates: http://finkakh.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
