> On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang <f...@csl.cornell.edu> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
>       Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's packaging 
> that bootstraps (much like its predecessor llvm34), but fails Shlib 
> validation because the install_names for shlibs all start with @rpath (or 
> on older darwin @executable_path or @loader_path).  This was a decision by 
> upstream build maintainers that allows this package to be 
> binary-relocatable, even though fink makes no such guarantees about its 
> packages -- fink's remain in fixed install locations.
> dmacks and akh began to look into a patch that would allow this to pass 
> validation.  Can you guys comment on the status/issues/obstacles? 
> Such a fix would unblock llvm35 from hitting dists.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Fang
> 
> -- 
> David Fang
> http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
> 
> 

I’ve pushed something that works for me to 
https://github.com/fink/fink/tree/runtime_path.

-- 
Alexander Hansen, Ph.D.
Fink User Liaison


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to