> On Sep 26, 2015, at 5:08 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth.at.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Daniel, > Any reason why we can't prune back the five different ruby packages in > the 10.9-libc++ to just the most current ruby22 packaging? I only see a > BuildConflicts on these packages in net/epic5.info and the legacy commented > BuildDepends line in languages/swig.info and languages/swig302.info. > Jack
1.8 and 1.9 are no longer supported upstream so I have no problem dumping them. Not everything has been updated to 2.2 though, svn-swig-rb only supports up to 2.1 for example, so we should check what other things depend on the older ones first before killing them. Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
