At 23:18 -0800 2002-01-12, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Michael Blakeley wrote:
>
>>  >It built properly here.  Try this:
>>  >
>>  >env -i PATH=/sw/bin:/sw/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin sudo \
>>  >   /sw/bin/fink reinstall xfree86-base
>>
>>  OK...
>>
>>  $ env -i PATH=/sw/bin:/sw/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin sudo \
>>  >  /sw/bin/fink reinstall xfree86-base
>
>Ooops.  I meant "rebuild", I think  :)

I got tired of waiting for the rebuild to complete, and noticed that 
I had xfree86-base-4.1.0-4 from stable in my /sw tree. So...

$ sudo dpkg --install 
/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/x11-system/xfree86-base_4.1.0-4_darwin-powerpc.deb
dpkg - warning: downgrading xfree86-base from 4.1.0-9 to 4.1.0-4.

...and that fixed the problem. Then I used
        apt-get update && apt-get upgrade xfree86-base
to fetch and install 4.1.0-8, which also seems to be fine.

I think I'll chalk this up to user error: I've been trying to avoid 
building anything that I can download in binary form, especially for 
huge packages like xfree86-base. So I mostly use apt-get, and I have 
fink set up for 'unstable' so I can get the latest version of 
anything that isn't available in binary form.

But I did the 'fink selfupdate' and 'fink update-all'[1] to get the 
latest point-release. So I got xfree86-base from unstable, and 
something went wrong there.

$ dpkg --contents 
/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/x11-system/xfree86-base_4.1.0-9_darwin-powerpc.deb
 
| grep libXf
-rw-r--r-- root/admin     4708 2002-01-12 01:30:52 
./usr/X11R6/lib/libXfontcache.a

A FAQ entry pointing to 
http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/users-guide/upgrade.php might help 
here, but mostly I should have realized that my methodology opened up 
the door to accidentally upgrading my binary packages with unstable 
source versions. Next time I think I'll use apt-get to upgrade, then 
_manually_ update selected source packages with fink, rather than 
running updateall - or at least remove 'unstable' from fink.conf 
first.

-- Mike

[1] why not self-update and update-all? or selfupdate and updateall? 
Or support for all four? My fingers keep getting confused.

_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to