On Tuesday, March 19, 2002, at 03:14 PM, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
> I do apologise for working at school, doing a bit of professional work, > and working on a wide array of opensource projects (Darwin, Fink, > GTK-Quartz from time to time), attempting to learn Java and WebObjects > at the same time and keep up with my constant influx of mail and > mailing lists. Gimme a break! Calm down ... you're taking this way too personally. Most of us have jobs and are trying to simultaneously learn Java or Python or XML or PHP or whatever, and most of us are trying to do our part to help out with open source projects like Fink at the same time. Why not just spend that time and energy getting it into the FAQ? >> (soon enough the next version of Fink will be out and it'll be moot >> anyway) > > Is this even correct? Since it afflicts and old version of the software > (it's a problem in 0.3.1), how is a new upstream revision going to fix > people's old and broken copies? Fine. Do you want to argue the parenthesized afterthoughts of my email, or just add the article to the FAQ? This is exactly the point I was trying to make -- that instead of picking nits or crying, why not just make the necessary changes and be done with it? Erik ---- Erik Price Web Developer Temp Media Lab, H.H. Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
