On Thursday, March 21, 2002, at 09:18 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> I've seen a number of questions regarding hidden dependency problems > with > the binary distro. Am I correct in assuming that the listed maintainer > for > a package is responsible for the corresponding binary? They are responsible for the package description which contains the list of dependencies and is used to build the binary, yes, even if they're not actually the one that builds the binary (since Max is the binary distro maintainer ATM AFAIK). -- Finlay _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
