ok, i will do that. actually, i will go directly for the python-2.1.3 version...
cheers, kilian On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 10:52:46AM -0600, Jeff Whitaker wrote: > > Killian: I'd like to propose an alternative, that would make life a lot > easier for me. Leave the python-2.2.1 package alone and rename the > python-2.1.2 package to python21-2.1.2. The python21 package would be > exactly the same as the existing python-2.1.2 package, except that the > python binary would be called python21, and the package would not conflict > with or replace python-2.2.1. Then, if you want to install a module (such > as zope) into python21 instead of python-2.2.1, you would run "python21 > setup.py" instead of "python setup.py". That way, users could have both > python-2.2 and python-2.1 installed at the same time, but they would be > required to explicity reference python21 to get the older python. > > -Jeff _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
