On 1/7/03 9:12 PM, "Hisashi T Fujinaka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed:

> The questions I've seen that are overly asked are incredibly simple, like
> "is it working," or "is system-xfree86 working?"
> 
> On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Chris Devers wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Rui Carmo wrote:
>> 
>>> I know this is OT in a Fink list, but is there a FAQ being compiled
>>> about Apple's X11 "per se", or rather, all the issues related just to
>>> it?
>> 
>> Has Apple's X11 been out long enough for any Q.'s to be F. A.?
>> 
>> In any case, it seems like the Fink developers are on top of things here.
>> Just keep an eye on the site & the list, follow any guidlines there, and
>> be sure to run a 'fink selfupdate-cvs' frequently so that any changes to
>> Fink are available to you.
>> 
>> Once we get some more Q's being A. F., I'm sure they'll be arranged into
>> the conventional order & put in a public place for examination :)

It is working well for me. So is (was) system-xfree86. However, I have
gotten X11 (apple) to work fine on top of fink's xfree86 build (at least for
now) using Jeff Whitaker's method.  He posted this earlier today to the
fink-devel list (see my notes below):

> ------ Forwarded Message
> From: Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 18:43:10 -0700 (MST)
> To: Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] fink xfree86 and Apple X11
> 
> On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> 
>> On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 08:30 PM, Jeff Whitaker wrote:
>> 
>>> Apple's X11 will work with fink xfree86-4.2.1.1 on 10.2.3.  I tested this by
>>> installing xfree86-base, xfree86-rootless (and shlibs), then copying over
>>> /Applications/X11.app, /usr/X11R6/bin/Xquartz, /usr/X11R6/bin/quartz-wm and
>>> /usr/X11R6/lib/libapplexp.1.0.dylib from an Apple X11 installation.  Double
>>> click on the X11 icon in /Applications, and voila, quartz-wm fires up.  Not
>>> as fast as running the full Apple installation though, but I suspect once
>>> xfree86 4.3 is released there won't be a noticeable difference.  Would be
>>> nice if someone would package up just those files from Apple's X11 , as
>>> alternative to Oroborus X.
>> 
>> There's at least a few more files too... the libdps (display
>> postscript) stuff, isn't standard, as far as I'm aware...
> 
> Maybe not, but it appears to work (as far as I can tell) without it.
> 
> -Jeff
> 
> -- 
> Jeffrey S. Whitaker         Phone : (303)497-6313
> NOAA/OAR/CDC  R/CDC1        FAX   : (303)497-6449
> 325 Broadway                Web   : http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/~jsw
> Boulder, CO, USA 80305-3328 Office: Skaggs Research Cntr 1D-124
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
> http://www.vasoftware.com
> _______________________________________________
> Fink-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
> 
> ------ End of Forwarded Message

Buyer beware. I actually am using xfree86-base-threaded-4.2.1.1-3 and
xfree86-rootless-threaded-4.2.1.1-3 . The new OpenGL graphics make my apps
freakin' scream. It's incredible.

D



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to