How clean was your clean reinstall? Did you actually remove all of /sw? These libiconv binaries were presumably generated by compiling from the unstable tree, since that's the latest version there.
On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 15:43, Mark Wilson wrote: > The following shows information for libiconv on my fink installation. I > recently did a clean reinstall of fink from the latest binary and did > selfupdate-cvs. I think there's something wrong here. The binaries for > libiconv and libiconv-bin are version 1.9.1-1 but the stable versions > are 1.7-7. These binaries are installed. libiconv-dev is not installed > and does not have a binary available. > > This configuration causes problems updating gettext to from 0.10.40-4 > (the latest version available in binary form) to 0.10.40-7 (the latest > stable version) and dependent updates that require the latest stable > gettext. > > Does anyone have any thoughts on how to put my fink installation in the > state it should be in? > > status current > name libiconv > installed 1.9.1-1 > unstable > stable 1.7-7 > binary 1.9.1-1 > category unknown > latest 1.9.1-1 > > status current > name libiconv-bin > installed 1.9.1-1 > unstable > stable 1.7-7 > binary > category unknown > latest 1.9.1-1 > > status > name libiconv-dev > installed > unstable > stable 1.7-7 > binary > category base > latest 1.7-7 > > Regards, > > Mark Wilson > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Fink-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users -- Alexander K. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
