Because of ignorance on my part: -lutil means to use libutil.dylib, then? That would clarify most everything then.

On Monday, October 20, 2003, at 12:43 PM, jfm wrote:

I must have missed something in this thread.
Why did the discussion switch from libutil (which doesn't exist on my system either)
to util.h (in /usr/include) ??


JF Mertens


On Friday, Oct 17, 2003, at 23:18 Europe/Brussels, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:


On Friday, October 17, 2003, at 04:40 PM, JP Glutting wrote:

I don't seem to have a util.h file in the /sw/include directory.
On Friday, Oct 17, 2003, at 04:08 Europe/Madrid, Alexander Hansen wrote:


That looks really odd to me, because on my system pthread.h and util.h are both in /usr/include . Check and see if you have /usr/include/util.h .

It also could be looking for a util.h that was installed via R.
On Thursday, October 16, 2003, at 10:18 AM, JP Glutting wrote:

configure:1696: checking for C compiler default output
configure:1699: gcc    conftest.c -lpthread -lutil >&5
ld: can't locate file for: -lutil
configure:1702: $? = 1
configure: failed program was:
#line 1679 "configure"
#include "confdefs.h"

int
main ()
{

  ;
  return 0;
}
configure:1729: error: C compiler cannot create executables
check `config.log' for details.

So it looks like the gcc can't find the "util" library.




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo
The Event For Linux Datacenter Solutions & Strategies in The Enterprise Linux in the Boardroom; in the Front Office; & in the Server Room http://www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to