On 26.02.2004, at 15:02, Gary Robinson wrote:
So, does it look like you're going to choose to take the time to get a jaguar build soon?
Not very soon, now. Maybe in one or two weeks. If i get some help from others, this might be different though...
Obviously you're a volunteer so whatever you do is pure
gift! But I have to ask, because I'm considering upgrading to Panther on the
server almost wholly to enable me to install svn. And I need to get svn
running today or tomorrow at latest -- the only other choice is to go with
CVS.
I would not go back to CVS, no! ;)
What happened is, our Linux server died, and we want to replace it with OS
X. And we've decided to try and take the opportunity to also move from cvs
to svn. But we can't wait to do all this...
Not to put pressure on you, since again obviously it's a gift that you're
doing this stuff at all!! But I just thought I'd mention the situation. ;)
I think that if svn is not going to be ready for jaguar today or tomorrow,
I'll upgrade the server to Panther. I have no other real reason to do it at
this point, and so would rather not, but I will if necessary.
I would recommend updating to Panther anyway. I did it on my server and i am more than pleased. The upgrade should run smoothly.
Sorry that i can't help you right now, Chris.
On 26.02.2004, at 13:40, David R. Morrison wrote:Actually, in the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree you shouldn't change the GCC field to 3.1; in that tree, it is supposed to be 3.3.
Ah, yes, sure. What was i thinking... You are right of cause.
So backporting may be quite easy after all.
Yes. It is just a matter of doing it and tracking all dependencies.
Thanks for correcting me, Chris.
Christian Schaffner wrote:
Hi Jack
On 25.02.2004, at 19:23, Jack Repenning wrote:On Feb 23, 2004, at 9:43 AM, Christian Schaffner wrote:The Fink packages (<http://fink.sf.net>) are now available for the final release of Subversion 1.0.0 in the MacOS X 10.3 unstable tree:
Is there any plan to build 1.0.0 for 10.2?
It should build almost as it it right now for 10.2 too. The problem is
that a few of the needed dependencies are not yet ported back to the
10.2-gcc3.3 tree. I hope i can do it eventually but haven't got the
resources at the moment.
If not, I'll be building my own ... can I contribute to finkization?
Sure. :) You could try move the dependencies to the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree,
see if they build, and report to the respective package maintainers.
Ask them if they move their packages. Mostly you just need to change
the GCC fiels to 3.1 (if the packages have it) and adjust the
dependecies. Also the package revisions should be lower than in the
10.3 tree if the GCC field is available, to allow easy upgrading.
Then you can try to adapt the svn 10.3 package to the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree, too.
That would help a lot! Thanks, Chris.
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
