I'm in england, so i'll have to try to update it over ssh/vnc.
-Ben On Jul 9, 2004, at 11:25 AM, Timothy Gregg wrote:
On Jul 8, 2004, at 2:46 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
It's completely appropriate to ask to increment a package to a newer upstream version.
Sometimes the patches work between version numbers, and sometimes not,
I guess this one doesn't, but I don't claim to understand the patch process in general. The output I get goes like this:
/Users/tmgregg>fink rebuild gramps
/usr/bin/sudo /sw/bin/fink rebuild gramps
Information about 1726 packages read in 0 seconds.
The following package will be rebuilt:
gramps
gzip -dc /sw/src/gramps-1.0.4.tar.gz | /sw/bin/tar -xf - --no-same-owner --no-same-permissions
perl -pi -e 's|imp.find_module|#imp.find_module|g' configure
sed 's|@PREFIX@|/sw|g' </sw/fink/dists/local/main/finkinfo/gramps.patch | patch -p1
patching file configure
Hunk #1 succeeded at 3278 (offset 183 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 3416 (offset 183 lines).
patching file src/Makefile.in
Hunk #1 FAILED at 106.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/Makefile.in.rej
patching file src/po/Makefile.in
Hunk #1 succeeded at 312 (offset 69 lines).
### execution of sed failed, exit code 1
Failed: patching gramps-1.0.4-12 failed
so you'd probably need to provide specific problems (like the .rej file)
I find the following in the /src directory after the failure:
/sw/src/gramps-1.0.4-12/gramps-1.0.4/src>more Makefile.in.rej *************** *** 106,112 **** SUBDIRS = docgen filters plugins data po calendars
# For intl. support, how do we compile?
- CFLAGS = -fPIC -shared -O @GNOMEINC@ @CFLAGS@ @CPPFLAGS@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@
LDFLAGS = @GNOMELIB@ @LDFLAGS@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ @LIBS@
CLEANFILES = grampslib.so
MOSTLYCLEANFILES =
--- 106,112 ----
SUBDIRS = docgen filters plugins data po calendars
# For intl. support, how do we compile?
+ CFLAGS = -bundle -undefined dynamic_lookup -O @GNOMEINC@ @CFLAGS@ @CPPFLAGS@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@
LDFLAGS = @GNOMELIB@ @LDFLAGS@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ @LIBS@
CLEANFILES = grampslib.so
MOSTLYCLEANFILES =
FWIW, gramp-1.0.3 worked fine, so the dependencies should all be fine. OSX10.3.4, 640 MB Ti400
I also tried building outside of Fink, but I don't know how to tell it to find some specific gnome-python stuff in /sw (followed the FAQ8.3).
Thanks for any help, Tim
On Jul 8, 2004, at 1:36 PM, Timothy Gregg wrote:
I wanted to use the latest Gramps bug fix version since I encountered one of the bugs in version 1.0.3 that was suppsedly fixed for 1.0.4. I have tried to spoof fink into using the 1.0.4 sources, but could not get the patch process to work after just changing the version number and MD5 in the .info file. Any specific suggestions on how to do this? Or is it inappropriate to ask if the unstable gramps could be incremented to 1.0.4?
Thanks, Tim Gregg
-- Alexander Hansen Fink Documentarian [Day Job] Levitated Dipole Experiment http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
