Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
[]
I would suspect that libofx has been deprecated in favor of
libofx1--they replace each other anyway (but the shared libraries can
coexist)--and you should just install that
It seems that someone didn't pay attention there. They obsoleted
libofx in the 10.3/stable tree, although gnucash still has a
BuildDepends on it. I think it is generally a bad idea to remove
package descriptions from stable while the package is still in the
bindist. And BTW, libofx1 does not exist in 10.3/stable.
Hopefully fixed now.
I don't have a 10.3 system to check, please let me know if it is still
broken.
Thanks,
Peter
Problem remains on 10.3. Neither libofx nor libofx1 are listed by Fink,
and an install by apt-get still generates the same error:
libofx: Depends: libofx-shlibs (= 0.6.6-13) but 0.6.6-14 is to be installed
I don't believe that libofx1 would solve any problems, even if it were
available, as the dependencies always seem to be extremely picky about
precise naming anyway.
Thanks for the help so far. Anything else I can test, please let me know.
Steven
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
