Martin Costabel wrote:
> Mark E. Perkins wrote:
> []
>> ./Services/execute_nonroot_okay........NOK 11# Failed test
>> (./Services/execute_nonroot_okay.t at line 115)
>> # got: 2
>> # expected: 0
> []
>> ./Services/execute_nonroot_okay........NOK 12# Failed test
>> (./Services/execute_nonroot_okay.t at line 128)
>> # got: 2
>> # expected: 0
>> # Looks like you failed 2 tests of 12.
>
> Another thought why these two tests can fail:
>
> Did you perhaps play with your /etc/sudoers file ("sudo visudo")? Maybe
> along the lines of Fink FAQ#5.10? The syntax has changed from Panther to
> Tiger. On 10.3 it was OK to have a line
>
> %admin ALL=NOPASSWD: ALL
>
> Now on 10.4 it must read
>
> %admin ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
>
> Otherwise you fail exactly these two tests, although with a different
> error message from yours.
The entire (useful) contents of my /etc/sudoers is:
Defaults env_delete+="PERLLIB PERL5LIB PERL5OPT"
# User privilege specification
root ALL=(ALL) ALL
%admin ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
Now I'm wondering if that Defaults line is a problem. As I recall that's
an addition to circumvent some privilege escalation problem that came up a
couple of years ago (I'm hazy on the particulars at the moment, but
probably have some notes on it somewhere).
Mark
>
> --
> Martin
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
