You would remember, i'm sure. It's possible some package or other did such a thing - i can readily imagine adding custom completion to "open" such that "open -a" completes further arguments as application names from /Applications, for instance.
Did you say you're using /usr/bin/bash? Is that distinct from /bin/bash? On 1/24/08, Viktor Haag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hrm... I will check, but to the best of my knowledge, I haven't added any > such custom completions.... > > V. > ------Original Message------ > From: Mark J. Reed > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Viktor Haag > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Fink-users] Problem with bash-completion and 'open' command > under 10.5.1? > Sent: 24 Jan 2008 14:17 > > On Jan 24, 2008 1:53 PM, Viktor Haag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have not done this to the best of my knowledge; where would such custom > > completion rules get stored? > > The rules aren't persisted, so they would take the form of "complete" > commands inside one of the startup files (e.g. /etc/bash_profile, > /etc/bashrc, ~/.bashrc, ~/.bash_profile). > > -- > Mark J. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -- Mark J. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
