Martin Costabel wrote: > Kevin Horton wrote: > [] >> For some reason, the new libiconv 1.12-1 that arrived via selfupdate >> a few hours ago differs quite substantially from the libiconv 1.12-3 >> that Benjamin offered for testing. > > Indeed. That's not what we all have been testing. And we didn't > notice, because we had 1.12-3 installed and so did not get "upgraded" > to 1.12-1. Indeed, it turns out that when copying the final version over, I should have svn up'd first.
I had been doing the testing on my 10.4 box, but I released to unstable from my 10.5 box, which had an older version. :( Fixed in unstable. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
