Jean-François Mertens wrote: [] > but right, if true it would encourage a fast update of anything in > fink to gcc43
I too have come round to the conclusion that this is indeed the best plan for action at this moment. I would suggest that we band together and do this update rather quickly. I am CCing fink-devel so that the maintainers of the 28 packages concerned get a chance to act, but I think we should just test this upgrade for each of these packages and then simply go ahead and change any package that builds correctly with gcc43. As far as I know, no problem with the switch from gcc42 to gcc43 has yet been reported. Here are the package descriptions concerned: graphics/pdftk.info libs/cfitsio.info sci/atlas.info sci/avl.info sci/cernlib2005.info sci/dx.info sci/fftw.info sci/fftw3.info sci/geant4.8.info sci/geant4.9.info sci/gopenmol.info sci/hdf5.info sci/libnc-dap3.info sci/netcdf-gfortran.info sci/octave-forge.info sci/octave.info sci/octplot.info sci/patchy4.info sci/plplot.info sci/qprop.info sci/root-pythia.info sci/root5-devel.info sci/root5.info sci/scilab.info sci/scipy-py.info sci/wip.info sci/xfoil.info utils/clamav.info -- Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
