On Mar 14, 2008, at 3:14 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:

> Koen van der Drift wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
> While I agree with your ld that this linker line is redundant, because
> it includes tree-inline.o twice, once directly and once via
> libbackend.a, my ld does not complain about duplicate symbols.
> []
>> Not sure if relevant, but I recently installed the iPhone SDK with an
>> updated xCode.
>
> This could very well be the case. What do you get from "ld -v"?
>
> --  
> Martin

Since I inadvertently blew away Xcode 3.0 while installing the  
iPhoneSDK, I'm interested in potential drawbacks. On an intel MBP, ld - 
v gives:

@(#)PROGRAM:ld  PROJECT:ld64-82.5

compared to ld-64-77 on my Xcode 3.0 ppc G5

Dave
--
David Reiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to