They quite possibly enabled different options in their build. In Fink's imagemagick-nox there isn't any _linkage_ to X11 per se, just that openexr builds GUI tools that run under X11. That would need to be noxified (and possibly other packages, too).
Viktor Haag wrote: > This is odd to me because I can download the image-magick binary > distribution and install it with little issue, and it does not appear > to have any shared libraries that contain this sort of stuff. On the > other hand, who knows how much stuff is balled up inside it's > generically named .so files... 8( > > This would seem to rather make the point of /having/ an ImageMagic-nox > package a bit questionable, no? > > On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Alexander Hansen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > My understanding about one avenue in which X11 comes in is that > openexr, which imagemagick* depends on, builds GUI tools. There > may be other indirect dependencies as well. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
