Well, I have neither coot nor ccp4 installed, via fink or otherwise. I
renamed xml2-config to xml2-confing-bak, ran fink install gkrellm2, and got
much further in the compilation process, but gtk+2 failed. I renamed
xml2-config back to the original and tried to install only gtk+2 but still
failed. Looking through the output in my Terminal, I can't pick out any
single error that may have caused this. The closest I can see is:
i686-apple-darwin9-gcc-4.0.1: /usr/X11/lib/libXrandr.2.0.0.dylib: No such
file or directory
make[4]: *** [libgdk-x11-2.0.la] Error 1
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2
### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.2.pmqy15 failed, exit code 2
Removing runtime build-lock...
Removing build-lock package...
/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-gtk+2-2.12.11-2
(Reading database ... 17432 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing fink-buildlock-gtk+2-2.12.11-2 ...
Failed: phase compiling: gtk+2-2.12.11-2 failed
I can't imagine there's anything wrong with my X system, I didn't tamper
with it at all after installing the newest version.
Dan
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:58:15 -0700
> From: "Dan Maftei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Fink-users] compiling gkrellm: fink does not recognize
> installed version of libxml
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> When trying to install the gkrellm2 package, I get this error
>
> checking for libxml libraries >= 2.6.27... configure: error: Version
> 2.6.16
> found. You need at least libxml2 2.6.27 for this version of libxslt
> ### execution of ./configure failed, exit code 1
>
> A fink list -i libxml gives:
>
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (~) fink list -i libxml
> Information about 3983 packages read in 0 seconds.
> i libxml2 2.6.30-1001 XML parsing library, version 2
> i libxml2-bin 2.6.30-1001 XML parsing library, version 2
> i libxml2-shlibs 2.6.30-1001 XML parsing library, version 2
> i system-pkgconfi 2.6.16-1 [virtual pkgconfig package representing
> l...
>
> I did a selfupdate followed by a update-all, but I get the same error. My
> fink version:
>
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (~) fink --version
> Package manager version: 0.28.5
> Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Thu Oct 30 13:28:41 2008, 10.5, i386
>
> I'm running OS X 10.5.5 on a MacBook Pro.
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:25:19 -0400
> From: "Alexander Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Fink-users] compiling gkrellm: fink does not recognize
> installed version of libxml
> To: "Dan Maftei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Dan Maftei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > When trying to install the gkrellm2 package, I get this error
> >
> > checking for libxml libraries >= 2.6.27... configure: error: Version
> 2.6.16
> > found. You need at least libxml2 2.6.27 for this version of libxslt
> > ### execution of ./configure failed, exit code 1
> >
> > A fink list -i libxml gives:
> >
> > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (~) fink list -i libxml
> > Information about 3983 packages read in 0 seconds.
> > i libxml2 2.6.30-1001 XML parsing library, version 2
> > i libxml2-bin 2.6.30-1001 XML parsing library, version 2
> > i libxml2-shlibs 2.6.30-1001 XML parsing library, version 2
> > i system-pkgconfi 2.6.16-1 [virtual pkgconfig package
> representing
> > l...
> >
> > I did a selfupdate followed by a update-all, but I get the same error. My
> > fink version:
> >
> > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (~) fink --version
> > Package manager version: 0.28.5
> > Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Thu Oct 30 13:28:41 2008, 10.5,
> i386
> >
> > I'm running OS X 10.5.5 on a MacBook Pro.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dan
> >
>
> I'll keep this on -users rather than crossposting.
>
> This sort of error is often due to non-Fink software with a different
> version of a package. Try running
>
> which xml2-config
>
> to see where the interfering item might be. If it's in /usr/local, we
> recommend renaming that entire directory during builds.
>
> --
> Alexander K. Hansen
> akh AT finkproject DOT org
> Fink User Liaison and Documenter
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:37:00 -0700
> From: "Dan Maftei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Fink-users] compiling gkrellm: fink does not recognize
> installed version of libxml
> To: "Alexander Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Thanks for the suggestion Alex: xml2-config is in /usr/bin, not /usr/local,
> although:
>
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (~) xml2-config --version
> 2.6.16
>
> which explains the problem. Let me see if I understand your suggestion: I
> should rename /usr/bin to anything else (or perhaps remove it from PATH?)
> during a build, so that fink only checks /sw/.../libxml for the version? I
> was under the impression that fink was very self-contained, i.e. it only
> works under its own /sw directory.
>
> Excuse the newbie questions, I perhaps should've posted on the other
> mailing
> list.
>
> Thanks,
> Dan.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:12:43 -0400
> From: Daniel Macks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Fink-users] compiling gkrellm: fink does not recognize
> installed version of libxml
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 02:37:00PM -0700, Dan Maftei wrote:
> > Thanks for the suggestion Alex: xml2-config is in /usr/bin, not
> /usr/local,
> > although:
> >
> > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (~) xml2-config --version
> > 2.6.16
> >
> > which explains the problem. Let me see if I understand your suggestion: I
> > should rename /usr/bin to anything else (or perhaps remove it from PATH?)
> > during a build, so that fink only checks /sw/.../libxml for the version?
> I
> > was under the impression that fink was very self-contained, i.e. it only
> > works under its own /sw directory.
> >
> > Excuse the newbie questions, I perhaps should've posted on the other
> mailing
> > list.
>
> It's a bug in the coot of ccp4 package (can't remember which)--has a
> private copy of libxml2 for its internal use, but accidentally makes
> its xml2-config public. Was fixed a month or so ago in unstable.
>
> dan
>
> --
> Daniel Macks
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks <http://www.netspace.org/%7Edmacks>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:38:58 +0100
> From: Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Fink-users] Installation problem of Boost
> To: Marc Pouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Marc Pouget wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > i never had any pb with fink so far, but now i cannot update the boost
> > package
> >
> > i did a fink selfupdate
> > i have a intel 10.4.11
> > my fink is:
> > :~$ fink -V
> > Package manager version: 0.28.6
> > Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Thu Oct 30 16:38:18 2008, 10.4,
> i386
>
> Which xcode version do you have installed? "fink list xcode"
>
> Google shows me a discussion of this at
> <http://archives.free.net.ph/message/20080706.012206.3115edab.ja.html>
> There the problem, which was diagnosed as a mismatch between compiler
> and assembler, disappered after installation of xcode-2.5.
>
> --
> Martin
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:46:48 -0400
> From: "Alexander Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Fink-users] compiling gkrellm: fink does not recognize
> installed version of libxml
> To: "Dan Maftei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Dan Maftei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Thanks for the suggestion Alex: xml2-config is in /usr/bin, not
> /usr/local,
> > although:
> >
> > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (~) xml2-config --version
> > 2.6.16
> >
> > which explains the problem. Let me see if I understand your suggestion: I
> > should rename /usr/bin to anything else (or perhaps remove it from PATH?)
> > during a build, so that fink only checks /sw/.../libxml for the version?
> I
> > was under the impression that fink was very self-contained, i.e. it only
> > works under its own /sw directory.
> >
> > Excuse the newbie questions, I perhaps should've posted on the other
> mailing
> > list.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dan.
> >
>
> That's not quite the case: It's very difficult to shield against
> stuff in /usr or /usr/local . The build tools are set up to look in
> those locations, and Fink adds its path to those locations.
>
> The /usr/bin/xml-config is OK--that's system-installed and so our
> packages are set up not to use it.
> --
> Alexander K. Hansen
> akh AT finkproject DOT org
> Fink User Liaison and Documenter
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:48:58 -0400
> From: "Alexander Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Fink-users] compiling gkrellm: fink does not recognize
> installed version of libxml
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Daniel Macks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 02:37:00PM -0700, Dan Maftei wrote:
> >> Thanks for the suggestion Alex: xml2-config is in /usr/bin, not
> /usr/local,
> >> although:
> >>
> >> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (~) xml2-config --version
> >> 2.6.16
> >>
> >> which explains the problem. Let me see if I understand your suggestion:
> I
> >> should rename /usr/bin to anything else (or perhaps remove it from
> PATH?)
> >> during a build, so that fink only checks /sw/.../libxml for the version?
> I
> >> was under the impression that fink was very self-contained, i.e. it only
> >> works under its own /sw directory.
> >>
> >> Excuse the newbie questions, I perhaps should've posted on the other
> mailing
> >> list.
> >
> > It's a bug in the coot of ccp4 package (can't remember which)--has a
> > private copy of libxml2 for its internal use, but accidentally makes
> > its xml2-config public. Was fixed a month or so ago in unstable.
> >
> > dan
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Macks
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks <http://www.netspace.org/%7Edmacks>
> >
> >
>
> As an addendum: the "bad" Fink coot still installs its libxml2 stuff
> in the Fink tree.
>
> --
> Alexander K. Hansen
> akh AT finkproject DOT org
> Fink User Liaison and Documenter
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fink-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
>
>
> End of Fink-users Digest, Vol 30, Issue 48
> ******************************************
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
