James Howse wrote: > Just an FYI, the latest version of maxima at their sourceforge site is > 5.17.1, perhaps it fixes this error. > Unfortunately, no; but it's apparently fixed in their current CVS version. I've gone ahead and updated to 5.17.1 in current/unstable regardless
-- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison >> On 22 Jan 2009, at 04:01, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> >> >>> Jean-François Mertens wrote: >>> >>>> On 22 Jan 2009, at 03:01, Sean Lake wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hello all, >>>>> >>>>> There's a bug in maxima 5.17.0-5. The input I type in is: >>>>> >>>>> integrate(r^(-3), r, R, inf); >>>>> >>>>> The output maxima gives me (after responding that R is positive) is: >>>>> >>>>> Integral is divergent >>>>> -- an error. To debug this try debugmode(true); >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I get the same, with the previous version of maxima and sbcl >>>> (machine just got back from repair, still updating..) >>>> _ and also with "maxima -l clisp" (I build maxima with both lisp >>>> engines enabled). >>>> Even just with : >>>> integrate(r^(-3),r,3,inf); >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> I don't know if this needs to be passed upstream or not, but thought >>>>> I'd run it by the list first. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Definitely, to maxima (conceivably still something wrong in the >>>> syntax ? >>>> But doesn't seem to me.) >>>> >>>> JF Mertens >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> I tried 5.13.0 on a Linux box, and got the right answer. I tried >>> 5.17.0 >>> on Windows (built versus GCL, I believe), and it gives the same >>> error as >>> for ours. I'm inclined to blame the current maxima itself on this. >>> >> >> Seems you have the most information to send the bug upstream ... :) >> >> JF >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
