On Jun 20, 2009, at 11:35 AM, Alexander Hansen <[email protected] > wrote:
> This may be a case of bit-rot. This version of svn was able to be > built > at one point. I was able to build it on my machine, but not in a > stable-only situation, since I was using the unstable tree versions of > the dependent libraries. > > It may be worth it for us to roll the current/unstable version of svn > over to stable, provided that the dependencies are available. Unfortunately, libapr.0 and libaprutil.0 are needed in stable first before I can move svn to stable. Those are the only dependencies that are still needed. The old svn is definitely bitrotted and I wouldn't even try to fix it. Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference! Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250. Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today! http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
