Brendan Cully wrote: > On Friday, 26 June 2009 at 21:49, Jean-François Mertens wrote: >> On 26 Jun 2009, at 20:48, Jean-François Mertens wrote: >> >>> But then I get another snag, lablgl-related (cf above) this time : >>>> ocamlmktop -I +lablGL -thread -o lablgtktop unix.cma threads.cma >>>> lablgl.cma \ >>>> -I . lablgtk.cma lablgtkgl.cma lablglade.cma lablgnomecanvas.cma >>>> lablgnomeui.cma lablpanel.cma lablrsvg.cma lablgtkspell.cma >>>> lablgtksourceview.cma gtkThread.cmo >>>> File "_none_", line 1, characters 0-1: >>>> Error: The file /sw/lib/ocaml/lablGL/lablgl.cma is not a bytecode >>>> object file >> Rebuilding lablgl-x11 solved the problem. >> Might deps of ocaml have to rebuilt >> after the recent update ?? > > Looks that way, yes. We should probably go with ocaml (=%v) or so.
IIRC, there was is no easy solution to this problem. Yes, at each update of ocaml, you should rebuild all ocaml-dependent packages (in a certain order). But you can't depend on ocaml (=%v), or else you will never be able to update ocaml without removing (by hand or automatically by apt-get) the dependent packages beforehand. Similar problem as for sbcl/maxima. -- Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
