-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 6/5/10 4:59 PM, Łukasz Kucharski wrote:
> Well, there is something
>
> luk32mac:~ luk32$ ls -l /usr/local
> total 0
> drwxrwxr-x 4 root wheel 136 Jun 21 2009 Qt4.5
> [...]
>
> luk32mac:~ luk32$ ls -l /usr/local/Qt4.5/
> total 656
> drwxrwxr-x 90 root wheel 3060 Aug 31 2009 mkspecs
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 root wheel 333347 Jun 21 2009 q3porting.xml
>
>
> I don't know if it's relevant.
>
> Also for now it is not crucial for me to get it built. I have found all
> dependencies to x11 and removed them. For now my 'update-all' continues.
> In fact the only thing left (after recursive removing -shlib ) that
> needed qt4-x11 was automoc-x11. To be frank this also seems strange
> since I did 'remove qt4-x11' so I think it should warn me about the
> dependency like with shlibs.
Nope.
fink show-deps automoc-x11
Information about 10379 packages read in 2 seconds.
Package: automoc-x11 (0.9.89-0.977962.3)
To install the compiled package...
The following other packages (and their dependencies) must be installed:
[none]
The following other packages must not be installed:
[none]
To compile this package from source...
The following packages are also compiled at the same time:
[none]
The following other packages (and their dependencies) must be installed:
cmake (>= 2.6.4-1)
fink (>= 0.29.7-1)
kde4-buildenv (>= 4.4.0-1)
qt4-x11 (>= 4.6.1-1)
system-openssl-dev
The following other packages must not be installed:
[none]
It doesn't carry a runtime dependency of any sort.
I also did a recurrent remove later.
> Nevertheless automoc-x11 still persisted and during 'update-all' forced
> 'qt4-x11' to be installed... don't know what to think of this.
>
> I do not know differences between qt4-mac and qt4-x11.
- -mac displays on the main (Aqua) display, -x11 uses the X11 display.
My goal is to
> have kile (the tex editor). For this I will need kde. I hope kde4 is
> okey, and there seems to be kde4-mac thing so I'll try going this way.
>
> For now I just would like to solve the problem out of curiosity and to
> make sure fink packages are okey and the fink system is internally
> coherent. Maybe some of the package dev's will get interested. I'd give
> 75% chance that this is package problem. Maybe due to some strange
> configuration at my site, but segmentation fault during make doesn't
> seem good and should really happen in my opinion.
>
> With regards,
> luk32
>
>
It's essentially impossible to prevent users from shooting _themselves_
in the foot.
I can pretty much guarantee that you won't see a segfault during build
if you don't get cross-contamination with non-Fink libraries that aren't
completely compatible.
Nobody ever reported the same issue before, and many people have built
qt4 using Fink.
- --
Alexander Hansen
Fink User Liaison
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkwKyVQACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ/25ACggKzL4qcmnBxuffiec8KPFJLa
270An2oDNfCknoK7AByxcAx9EW+/f++g
=PS0T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
